JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 6, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jorge Alberto Ramos Tibaquira

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Seccion Segunda Sub-Seccion B Del Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca Y El Juzgado Cuarto Civil Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca - Seccion Segunda Sub-Seccion B Que Asuma De Forma Inmediata El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Señalamiento de autoridad pública u órgano autor de la amenaza o agravio al derecho fundamental
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia a prevención
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Reglas fijadas determinan autoridad judicial a asumir
  • Aplicación
  • Reglas para el trámite administrativo de reparto
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Accion De Tutela Contra Electrificadora De Cundinamarca
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca - Seccion Segunda Subseccion "B" - que asuma, de forma inmediata, el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.